Washington Report, April 2006, pages 22-23
Special Report
U.S. Aid to Palestinians Vital to Repair Effects of U.S. Aid to
Israel
By Delinda C. Hanley
 |
 |
(L-r) Dr. Peter Gubser, Dr. Ziad Asali
and Dr. James Zogby describe the humanitarian and political
consequences of suspending U.S. aid to Palestinians (Staff
photo D. Hanley). |
| |
|
AMERICAN taxpayers may be unaware that their hard-earned dollars
are playing a highly visible role in the Arab-Israeli conflict.
But graffiti painted on Israel’s “annexation wall” clearly
spells it out: “Apartheid Wall Paid for With U.S. Tax
Dollars.” U.S. aid to Israel also has been used to construct
checkpoints and commercial crossings that have strangled the Palestinian
economy. Israel closed many of these crossings at the height of
the winter export season for fruits and vegetables. As a result,
farmers in Gaza alone lost $20 million when tomatoes, flowers,
strawberries and other crops rotted in trucks. In 2003-2005, before
Israeli settlers withdrew from Gaza, soldiers bulldozed orchards
and destroyed the region’s $27 million-a-year citrus industry.
Tax-exempt Jewish American charities heavily fund settlements
built for Jews only which now sprawl across West Bank hilltops
and Jerusalem. U.S. government aid to Israel, $3 to $4 billion
annually for decades, helps Israel pay the bills for its costly
occupation, including helicopter gunships, tanks, high-tech weapons,
Caterpillar bulldozers, and armed-to-the-teeth soldiers and settlers.
U.S. taxpayers’ largess has no preconditions. As a result,
Israel is free to use American tax revenue for military operations
which destroy Palestinian roads, water tanks, sewage lines, electrical
poles and police stations, not to mention shops, homes, orchards
and lives. If Americans halted U.S. aid until Israel complied with
U.N. resolutions, recognized Palestine, ceased all terrorism, and
withdrew from the occupied territories, the result would be peace.
Surrounded by sickening evidence of their government’s one-sided
support of Israel, American visitors, not to mention Palestinians,
would despair if it weren’t for signs popping up in the West
Bank and Gaza. The signs—posted near schools, community centers,
libraries, clinics, playgrounds, waste water treatment projects,
new roads and other infrastructure repair schemes—read: This
project “has been generously donated by the American people
through USAID under the JOBS Program through ANERA.” The
U.S. Agency for International Development and American Near East
Refugee Aid, and other American organizations are providing jobs
and hope in a region sorely in need of both. The resulting good
will makes one proud to be an American even in a land that this
nation has helped Israel impoverish.
Jericho’s gregarious Deputy Mayor Ali Dana and city council
member Sameer Johar, a math and physics teacher at nearby Ein Sultan
refugee camp, point with pride to the modern hotels, restaurants,
boulevards and historic sites that used to draw tourists from around
the world. “Every centimeter tells a story in Jericho,” notes
Dana. “It’s an encyclopedia of history.”
Thanks to an Israeli checkpoint and frequent closures, however,
most visitors now stay away. It’s often impossible for local
farmers and merchants to get the lush fruit, dates and vegetables
that grow in Jericho’s rich soil and mild climate past those
checkpoints. Jericho’s economy is shattered.
“We hate no one. We want a fair and peaceful life. Israel
should also want to make peace with us,” says Deputy Mayor
Dana. “You can’t throw a party in a starving neighborhood.
You need to share food. Peace is as necessary as food. You can’t
have progress without it. We don’t deny Israelis’ right
to live, but we need it too. They cannot erase us from the map.”
Not so long ago, according to Moktar Abu Mohammed, Palestinians
fetched water from canals or carted water by donkey to their homes.
Israelis evicted Abu Mohammed from Dawaimeh, a village east of
Hebron, and resettled him in the Ein Sultan refugee camp outside
Jericho. He showed off recent improvements U.S. aid helped to make
in the bleak but immaculate camp. But, of course, he still misses
his village: “Given a choice of all the palaces in the world,
a Palestinian would prefer to live in a cave in his homeland,” Abu
Mohammed explained.
 |
 |
Thanks to a joint USAID-ANERA
project, this mother of four boys now has a sink and a bathroom
in the courtyard of her home in the Ein Sultan refugee camp
outside Jericho (Photo by Michael Keating). |
|
|
Thanks to a joint USAID-ANERA project, Ein Sultan residents can
now turn on a spigot and get clean water at home. Visiting Americans
are treated like celebrities and thanked profusely for helping
Palestinians: “You’re American? Drink tea with my family.
Come see our new sink. We have a modern bathroom.”
This is not charity. Palestinians, who are a proud people did
the work, and received badly needed paychecks for their labors.
Each resident also helped pay for his own water meter, and Abu
Mohammed and other members of the refugee camp’s water co-op
print and distribute water bills. American funds may have helped
build the infrastructure, but Palestinians have taken it from there.
Librarian Mai Fawzi Helal glowed with pride as she pointed out
meeting rooms, desks for computers, and rows of mostly empty shelves
in Jericho’s new municipal library, another joint USAID-ANERA
project. A now familiar sign also adorns the courtyard of the Fatima
Az-Zahra Girls School. American tax dollars and donations doubled
the size and renovated an overcrowded school. A sunny, freshly painted library,
with dog-eared children’s books, some in English, tempt readers. “Now
we need some sports equipment and new books,” Principal Intisar Bali
hinted.
Thanks to Israel’s recent lobbying efforts, U.S. aid, both
governmental and private, may soon end. American plaques, gifts,
and grateful Palestinian smiles may disappear from the West Bank
and Gaza. To punish Palestinians who voted for a Hamas government,
the U.S. government has frozen a planned $234 million aid package
and demanded the return of another $50 million in unspent funds.
This followed the Israeli cabinet’s decision to hold on to
$50 million a month in taxes and duties collected from Palestinians.
Americans and Israelis have vowed that no money will go to a Hamas
government unless Hamas recognizes Israel’s right to exist,
dismantles its terrorist organization, and agrees to work toward
a peace settlement.
This past February Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) introduced
H.R. 4681, the Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act 2006. The resolution
could restrict U.S. humanitarian aid; designate Palestinian territory
as a “terrorist sanctuary”; trigger restrictions on
U.S. exports; and even prohibit Palestinian diplomacy or representation
in the United States. A milder version of the bill, Concurrent
Resolution 79, is also wending its way through the Senate.
Since 1993, Palestinians have received more than $1.7 billion
in U.S. economic assistance via USAID projects. U.S. organizations,
like ANERA, United Palestinian Appeal, AMIDEAST, Kinder USA, the
Near East Foundation, Holy Land Christian Ecumenical Foundation,
Mercy Corps, and others have worked to repair the infrastructure
Israel has crushed over the years.
To add insult to injury, on Feb. 20 the U.S. Treasury Department
froze the assets of the Ohio-based nonprofit charitable organization,
KindHearts, a longtime advertiser in the Washington Report.
The government claims the organization has contributed aid to Hamas-affiliated
organizations. Similar post-9/11 actions against Muslim charities
caused untold hardship to Palestinians. Most charges were dropped
after lengthy and costly court cases.
Two dozen Arab American and humanitarian groups held a day-long
summit on Palestinian aid in Washington, DC on Feb. 17. Following
the summit, Dr. Ziad Asali of the American Task Force on Palestine,
Dr. James Zogby of the Arab American Institute, and ANERA’s
Dr. Peter Gubser spoke to reporters at the National Press Club
about the humanitarian and political consequences of suspending
U.S. aid.
“This is not the time to walk away from the Palestinian
people,” Zogby argued. “The notion that this money
goes to the Palestinian Authority, and will therefore benefit Hamas,
is wrong. Funds go to U.S. and Palestinian private contractors
and civil society institutions. Suspending this aid would do grave
damage to Palestinian society and cause the U.S. to become even
more isolated from Palestinian moderates.”
Impoverishment and loss of dignity of the Palestinian people “have
been major causes of loss of hope and radicalization,” Asali
pointed out. “The last thing the Palestinians need is an
economic crisis.”
Added Gubser, “In these increasingly challenging times,
the U.S. should remain fully engaged with the Palestinian people.
It’s in our national interest to do so as we seek a solution
to the Palestine-Israel conflict. And as the welfare of the Palestinian
people continues to decline, we have a powerful humanitarian reason
to maintain America’s substantial assistance program in the
West Bank and Gaza.”
Until Israel stops oppressing Palestinians, it’s essential
for the United States to remain engaged. On Feb. 22 Israeli army
bulldozers protected by armed soldiers destroyed a U.S.-funded
public park and children’s playground and swimming pool in
Azzun, near the West Bank town of Qalqilya. USAID contributed $80,000
for the $120,000 project which is now rubble.
If polled, U.S. taxpayers likely would prefer to use $400 million
to fund playgrounds, water projects and good will rather than $4
billion for Caterpillar bulldozers, tanks, hatred and injustice.
Delinda C. Hanley, a former Peace Corps volunteer, is news
editor of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. |