Neocons, Ex-Israeli Diplomats Push Islamophobic Video

By Ali Gharib and Eli Clifton

A GROUP of hard-line U.S. neoconservatives and former Israeli diplomats, among others, are behind the mass distribution, ahead of the November U.S. presidential election, of a controversial DVD that critics have denounced as Islamophobic.

The group, the Endowment for Middle East Truth (EMET), is working with another organization called the Clarion Fund, which produced the 60-minute video and is itself tied closely to an Israeli organization called Aish Hatorah.

The Fund distributed some 28 million copies of the DVD through newspaper inserts in key electoral “swing” states—states like Michigan, Ohio, and Florida that, according to fall polling, could go either way in November’s presidential election.

According to Delaware incorporation papers, the Clarion Fund is based at the same New York address as Aish Hatorah, a self-described “apolitical” group dedicated to educating Jews about their heritage.

The Clarion Fund’s street address as listed on the group’s Web site and a DVD mailer for the film is apparently not a physical address, but rather a “virtual address” that goes to a post office box in New York City.

Critics allege that the movie “Obsession” is “hate propaganda” which paints Muslims as violent extremists and, among other things, explicitly compares the threat posed by radical Islam to that of Nazi Germany in the 1930s.

At least two major metropolitan newspapers solicited to insert the paid advertisement into their product refused to do so because of a perceived bias in the film.

“Despite the perilous state of American newspapers, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch advertising department took an ethical stand and refused to distribute the DVD of a film that for two years has troubled American Muslims,” wrote Tim Townsend, a reporter at Missouri’s most influential newspaper, after it rejected the ad in September.

While the initial press reports about the mass distribution focused on the Clarion Fund’s financing role, it was EMET that organized and oversaw the distribution, EMET’s spokesman, Ari Morgenstern, told IPS. Morgenstern, a former press officer for the Israeli Embassy here, said he contacted IPS at the Clarion Fund’s request.

EMET, according to a recent press release, is “a non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to policy research and analysis on democracy and the Middle East.”

According to filings made in compliance with the organization’s tax-exempt 501(c)(3) status, “the organization hosts seminars, debates and educational films featuring Middle East experts in order to educate policymakers and the public at large on the common threats facing Israel and the United States.”

Morgenstern told IPS that EMET was “partnered with the Clarion Fund” on what he called the “Obsession Project,” which he identified as “an initiative of EMET.” He declined to name the Project’s donors. A spokesman for the Clarion Fund, Gregory Ross, has also refused to name the Fund’s donors, whose identity remains a mystery.

Morgenstern also declined to specify the cost of the DVD distribution, but did say, “it costs a great deal—it’s a multi-million-dollar effort.” Outside experts have estimated the cost of the operation, including reproduction and distribution, at between $15 million and $50 million.

Like hard-line neoconservatives, EMET opposes any land concessions to Palestinians and takes other hard-line positions identified with Israel’s right-wing Likud Party and the "Settler Lobby’’ there. EMET’s Web site says, “We regard ourselves as ‘intellectual revolutionaries.’”

The group’s acronym, EMET, mirrors the name of a predecessor to the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, which was called Emet. The word means “truth” in Hebrew.

On Sept. 10, EMET sponsored a seminar series on Capitol Hill named for the controversial multi-billionaire casino and hotel magnate Sheldon Adelson, a major donor to right-wing Zionist organisations in the U.S.; the far-right lobby group, Freedom’s Watch; and the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC), whose efforts to persuade Jewish voters that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama is aligned with radical anti-Israel forces in the Islamic world have drawn strong criticism from the mainstream Jewish press here.

EMET’s board of advisers includes a list of familiar neoconservative figures, as well as three former Israeli diplomats, including a former deputy chief of mission in Israel’s Washington embassy.

The group is headed by Sarah Stern, who began her activism on Israeli issues in opposition to the 1993 Oslo accords between Israel and Palestinians. She made a career out of her activism in the far-right Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) as its national policy coordinator from 1998 through 2004.

Notable members of the advisory board include prominent hard-line neoconservatives, including former U.S. U.N. Amb. the late Jeane Kirkpatrick; Daniel Pipes of the Middle East Forum; and the Hudson Institute’s Meyrav Wurmser, the Israeli-born spouse of Vice President Dick Cheney’s former top Middle East adviser, David Wurmser.

Other prominent neoconservative members of the board include Center for Security Policy (CSP) president Frank Gaffney; former CIA chief James Woolsey; and Heritage Foundation fellows Ariel Cohen and Nina Shea, who has also served for years on the quasi-governmental U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom.

The U.S.-born and -educated hard-line deputy managing editor of the Jerusalem Post and senior fellow for Middle Eastern Affairs at Gaffney’s CSP, Caroline Glick, is also an adviser.

Glick, Pipes, and Walid Shoebat, a “reformed” terrorist and EMET adviser, are all featured as experts in “Obsession.”

Also among the top names of listed advisers to EMET are three Israeli diplomats. Two of them, Ambassadors Yossi Ben Aharon and Yoram Ettinger, were among the three Israeli ambassadors whom then-Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin referred to as “the Three Musketeers” when they lobbied Washington in opposition to the Oslo accords. Indeed, Stern began her career at the behest of three unnamed Israeli diplomats who were based in Washington under Rabin’s predecessor, Yitzhak Shamir, according to EMET’s Web site.

Ettinger was at one time the chairman of special projects and is still listed as a contributing expert at the Ariel Center for Policy Research, a hard-line Likudist Israeli think tank that opposes the peace process.

Ben Aharon was the director general—effectively the chief of staff—of Shamir’s office.

The third Israeli ambassador, Lenny Ben-David, was appointed by Likud Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to serve as the deputy chief of mission—second in command—at the Israeli Embassy in Washington from 1997 until 2000. Ben-David had also held senior positions at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee for 25 years and is now a consultant and lobbyist.

But EMET is not the only group involved in the “Obsession” controversy to have direct ties to Israel.

The Clarion Fund has also been criticised for initially denying its ties to the Israel’s Aish Hatorah, which were first disclosed publicly by an IPS investigation last year.

Honestreporting.com, an organization set up by Aish Hatorah and also a client of Ben-David, admitted to IPS that it had aided the production of the film.

The Clarion Fund and Aish Hatorah are headed by twin Israeli-Canadian brothers Raphael and Ephraim Shore, respectively. The two groups appear to be connected, as Clarion is incorporated in Delaware to the New York offices of Aish Hatorah.

“It seems that the Clarion Fund, from what we can tell, is just a virtual organization that is a front for Aish Hatorah,” Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), told IPS. “They don’t have staff, they don’t have a physical address. Nothing.”

Little is known about the shadowy Clarion Fund, which is listed with the New York Secretary of State’s office as a “foreign not-for-profit foundation.” The group has rejected requests for information about its donors.

IPS has, however, uncovered one donor to the Clarion Fund, the Mamiye Foundation, which gave it $25,000 in August of 2007, according to tax filings. Four Mamiyes, Charles M., Charles D., Hyman and Abraham, are listed as trustees on the forms.

According to filings with the New York Secretary of State, a contact listed for a Mamiye company is also the same man listed as a contact and counsel for the Clarion Fund—Eli D. Greenberg of the law firm Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman and Herz.

Foreign nationals and companies, and domestic tax-exempt 501(c)(3) non-profits, are prohibited by federal election law from attempting to sway U.S. elections at any level through either contributions to campaigns or advocacy.

Morgenstern, EMET’s spokesman, said that the DVD distribution only went to “swing states” because media attention is focused there, and EMET is hoping to spark a public debate about the threats posed by “radical Islam.”

But CAIR has filed a complaint asking the Federal Election Commission to review the actions of the Clarion Fund both as a foreign entity and as a non-profit.

The complaint by Nadhira Al-Khalili, CAIR’s legal counsel, asked that both charges be investigated.

SIDEBAR

Major Talking Points on “Obsession”

“Obsession” is made by a quasi-official Israeli propaganda organization, honestreporting.com, which is closely linked to the Israeli Foreign Ministry.

The film equates Muslims, and not only radical Muslims, with Nazis.

It casts the Palestinian national movement as a Nazi-inspired and neo-Nazi movement.

It never mentions or acknowledges the occupation in Palestine or that Palestinians might have any reason other than Nazism to be in a conflict with Israel.

Large parts of the film present themselves as exposing Arab and Muslim hate-speech, but by misrepresenting fringe and marginal discourses as mainstream views, “Obsession” is guilty of the very hate-speech it purports to denounce.

Converts from Islam to right-wing evangelical Christianity are presented as simply Arab commentators, presumed to know what they are talking about, or “former terrorists” or other highly dubious representations.

“Obsession” argues that all conflicts involving Muslims are fronts in a neo-Nazi global campaign of world conquest by radical Muslims.

This is a mirror-image of Osama bin Laden’s reading of world affairs, in which all conflicts involving Muslims are fronts in a global crusade to destroy Islam—both are a-historical and absurd, and reveal a similar mind-set of reductionism, chauvinism and paranoia.

The film opens with the statement that most Muslims do not support terrorism, but immediately sets to work undermining this idea and eventually drops the pretense altogether.

The intent of the film to promote fear and hatred is absolutely clear, as is its stunningly bad faith with regard to facts and context—it is as shameless a piece of propaganda as one might ever identify.

Its effect can only be to produce anxiety, mistrust and deep unease in the average American viewer about the presence, activities and attitudes of millions of their fellow citizens, the American Muslim community.

It should be exposed at every turn, shunned by all respectable institutions and not shown on campuses without at least being accompanied by a panel discussion in which the extreme problems with the film, its effects and the intentions of its makers, can be fully discussed.

—Muslim Public Affairs Council