Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, June 2004, page
88
Book Review
Tell Me Lies: Propaganda and Media Distortion in the Attack
on Iraq
By David Miller (editor), Pluto Press, 2004, 310 pp. List:
$19.95; AET: $14.50.
Reviewed by Paul de Rooij
The 2003 U.S. war on Iraq was accompanied by one of the largest
propaganda campaigns in history—in which the American and British
publics were subjected to a barrage of misinformation, lies and
outright attempts to induce fear. Opposition to the war in Europe
and elsewhere required a massive campaign to cow people into silence
while George Bush and Tony Blair pursued their elective war. The
implications of this propaganda campaign range much wider than
just the policy consequences in the Middle East, extending to the
survival of Western democracy and the nature of our societies. Tell
Me Lies, David Miller’s very important book, helps us understand
what we were subjected to, how this was done, how this has evolved
in recent history, and what media alternatives are available to
counter this trend. A multifaceted examination of this phenomenon,
Miller’s book is a welcome addition to an expanding literature
on this topic.
Tell Me Lies contains a collection of well-chosen articles
from a range of knowledgeable writers and activists. These writers
comprise eminent journalists (John Pilger, Robert Fisk, Tim Llewellyn),
academics (Greg Philo, Miller), media critics (Norman Solomon,
Edward Herman, David Edwards, David Cromwell, Noam Chomsky), government
propaganda specialists (Nancy Snow), Middle East experts and people
working in alternative media. The articles complement each other
very well and don’t seem to overlap—a risk when so many authors
contribute to such a book.
The first few articles are by Pilger, and help one reflect on
recent history. His accounts convey a moral outrage and highlight
why it is important to be concerned about the mass deception. Once
Pilger has set the stage, other authors delve into the mechanics
and history of propaganda. Snow presents an insider’s account of
America’s “public diplomacy” machinery; another article provides
a similar account of the British propaganda operations (aka I/Ops).
In their articles considering the historical context of how propaganda
campaigns have evolved in recent wars, Philip Knightley and Des
Freedman demonstrate that government propaganda machines increasingly
control the flow of information. Lessons were learned in Vietnam,
where journalists had considerable leeway; the tendency since then
has been to severely restrict access to war zones and to expunge
all images that convey the ghastly aspects of war. Taken together
with the U.S.-Iraq propaganda campaign, it is clear that the tendency
is for more control, for longer periods, and over a wider range
of media coverage—even MTV had an embedded journalist during the
war!!
The articles by Herman and Greg Philo/M. Gilmour are the most
valuable contributions to the book. Herman demolishes the propaganda
claims of the run-up to the war, and clarifies the pattern of propaganda.
Philo/Gilmour’s article examines university students’ knowledge
of history—an evaluation obtained by studying focus groups. It
is disturbing to find that only 8 percent of British students interviewed
knew the origin of the Palestinian refugee problem, and only 5
percent of them knew what a “gulag” was. The implication is that
television—the main source of information—is not providing the
general population with basic contextual information. Propaganda
campaigns are effective because they target a population with poor
general knowledge of political issues. Because they don’t have
key contextual information, most people don’t realize they are
being manipulated. One disturbing implication of these findings
is that propagandists may seek to keep this general level of knowledge
very low so that media deceptions will be effective.
Mark Curtis certainly found a nugget in the UK Ministry of Defense
Web site:
“Increasing emotional attachment to the outside world, fueled
by immediate and graphic media coverage, and a public desire to
see the UK act as a force for good, is likely to lead to public
support, and possibly public demand, for operations prompted by
humanitarian concerns.”
Hence, public attitudes must be shaped so that military activities
aren’t constrained, let alone face demands to have the military
be used in legitimate peacekeeping! If propaganda is seen to have
a role to counter such perceptions and demands, then the implications
are far-ranging indeed. The more disturbing aspects dealt with
in the book are indications that mass deception campaigns can also
be used to subvert the nature of our democratic societies. If the
will of the people can be manipulated to make wars possible, then
other aspects of a democracy can be subverted as well.
In an interview, Fisk presents his journalistic philosophy—and
further proof of his courage in covering events in the Middle East.
If only more journalists would take their duty to inform the public
more seriously, and show some more backbone, our media would be
more exciting—and it would certainly hamper propagandists’ opportunities
to deceive their target populations. Fisk discusses what he considers
the essential role of journalism, which certainly goes counter
to the recent trends in American journalism—where the journalist
is a moral eunuch, only seeking to present what people say without
interpretation or opinion. This article indicates that another
media world is possible.
The answer to the mass media deception campaigns is not to switch
off the TV or turn to light entertainment. For the implications
of inaction are far too stark—wars, the misery of millions of people,
and democracy itself are involved. The only alternative is actively
to confront propaganda and seek out alternative information.
As an important case study of a huge propaganda campaign, Tell
Me Lies provides the framework needed to understand what
we were subjected to and how it was done. This is essential knowledge
to counter the insidious phenomenon that is becoming entrenched
in our societies.
Paul de Rooij is a Dutch economist, mathematician, activist
and writer living in London. He can be reached at <proox@hotmail.com>. |