Washington Report, May/June 2006, pages 21-22
Special Report
Rachel Corrie: Will Americans Get to Hear The Voice of an American
Anne Frank?
By Delinda C. Hanley
AMERICANS are usually excessively polite when it comes to talking
about religion or politics. We don’t want to hurt anyone’s
feelings, so we may avoid discussing either subject too passionately
with strangers—or even at the dinner table. We’re taught
to listen carefully to both sides of an argument before we make
up our mind. Not only is that how we’re raised, but it’s
the cornerstone of our government and our judicial system.
There are many families which do not shy away from controversial
issues, however. When my parents, Dick and Donna Curtiss, were
teaching their children table manners and when to speak and when
to listen, they also taught another lesson by example. My mother
(with her aunt and toddler in tow) joined sit-ins at Woolworth
lunch counters in Virginia to protest their refusal to serve African
Americans, and for years both my parents protested peacefully in
the streets of Washington, DC—sometimes every day—on
behalf of Palestinian rights.
They taught me that if we witness injustice or the violation of
another human being’s rights it’s our duty to take
the gloves off and speak up—even if it hurts some feelings.
I can’t count how many times I read Anne Frank: Diary
of a Young Girl. This book has been translated into more
than 100 languages and studied by millions of schoolchildren
around the world. We all know her story by heart. Anne’s
father, Otto, tried to protect his family from Nazi persecution
of Jews by moving from Germany to Holland. He fails. Hidden with
her family and Jewish friends in an attic for more than two years,
however, Anne discovers herself as she writes about her life.
Everyone who’s read her diary or seen the films loves Anne
and hates the end of her story. Nazis discover the Franks’ secret
hiding place, arrest the family, along with the Dutchmen who’d
helped hide them, and send them to concentration camps. Anne died
of typhus in March 1945 in Bergen-Belsen when she was only 15.
Two months later, after World War II ended, Otto—the only
survivor from the attic room—returned to Amsterdam, found
his daughter’s diary and presented Anne’s words to
the world.
The story of Anne Frank’s life and death resonates with
people of all ages and backgrounds. Anne’s diary provides
a vehicle for people to learn from Europe’s Holocaust and
examine prejudice, persecution, discrimination, hatred and violence.
Anne’s words survive death and inspire young people
to express their idealism. Her faith that good will triumph over
evil still gives us hope.
It defies belief that anyone today, especially Jewish Americans,
would try to bury the words of another young heroine, Rachel Corrie,
the brave 23-year-old American girl crushed to death on March 16,
2003 as she tried to prevent the demolition of a civilian family’s
home in the Gaza Strip. Indeed, few Americans have even heard about
the sweet brave life and the horrifying death of Rachel Corrie.
Unfortunately, that suits some people—Israel-right-or-wrong
Americans, Jews and Christians alike—just fine.
Rachel Corrie is the Joan of Arc of the human rights movement,
a martyr for Palestinians and for nonviolent protesters around
the world. Like Otto Frank, her parents, Craig and Cindy, recognized
the power and passion of her e-mails home and shared them with
the world. When people saw the Corrie family’s home movie
of Rachel, aged 10, on a school stage reciting her poem about how “children
everywhere are suffering” and how she wished to “stop
hunger by the year 2000,” she became a daughter to us all.
We’re achingly proud of her loving spirit and we mourn her
death.
But when Jewish theater patrons and their rabbis heard that Rachel’s
Corrie’s words would be brought to life at the New York Theater
Workshop—as they had earlier in London—they complained.
Artistic director James Nicola’s theater suddenly “postponed” indefinitely
the U.S. debut of “My Name Is Rachel Corrie.”
Actress Vanessa Redgrave, who has paid a high professional price
for her empathy for Palestinians, said it best: “This
is censorship of the worst kind. More awful even than that. It
is black-listing a dead girl and her diaries. A very brave and
exceptional girl who all citizens, whatever their faith or nationality,
should be proud and grateful for...”
Censorship is not uncommon when it comes to criticism of Israeli
actions. Americans don’t want to offend Jews who have suffered
so much, so we censor ourselves. We so dread being labeled anti-Semitic
that we commit another sin—we stand by, or even assist Israel,
as it ethnically cleanses Palestinians from their land. We look
the other way when Israel wrongs Palestinians—or
even our fellow Americans.
The survivors of Israel’s deliberate attack on the USS Liberty know
the routine. On June 8, 1967, during the Six-Day War that Israel
launched against the Arabs, Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo
boats attacked the American intelligence ship USS Liberty for
75 minutes in international waters. Thirty-four Americans were
killed and 174 were wounded. This shocking war crime has been hushed
up by American officials for years. Survivors were warned never
to talk about the worst day of their lives. They are labeled “anti-Semitic” when
they gather each year to remember their shipmates and call for
an official investigation of the attack.
Whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu served 18 years in prison, 11 in
solitary confinement, for telling the world that Israel was working
on an illegal nuclear weapons program. While serving his sentence
in Israel Vanunu, who earlier had converted to Christianity, was
adopted by an American couple. Vanunu hoped to emigrate to the
United States after his release and live in peace and safety. But
Israel won’t even let him leave Jerusalem, and the courts
are trying to put him back in jail and throw away the key. Americans
are too polite to exert political pressure on his behalf.
Israel-first Americans aren’t so polite.
Just before the “My Name is Rachel Corrie” controversy
erupted in New York, the Washington Report received a note
from Barbara Lubin, executive director of the Middle East Children’s
Alliance (MECA). Lubin is a Jewish American activist who has dedicated
her life to helping Palestinian children survive Israel’s
occupation. She told us that MECA had teamed up with the Berkeley
Art Center and Alliance Graphics to present an exhibit last November
and December called “Justice Matters: Artists Consider Palestine.” In
their works 14 Palestinian and American artists addressed Israel’s
occupation and colonization of Palestine.
The artists, MECA and the Berkeley Art Center were attacked by
the Anti-Defamation League, the Simon Wiesenthal Center and other
people who claimed to represent the mainstream Jewish community.
According to Jos Sances, curator of “Justice Matters,” “there
was even an effort to close the show down and have the city withdraw
its annual support for the Berkeley Art Center.”
Fourteen rabbis (one for each artist?) visited Berkeley’s
mayor to condemn the exhibit. The artists were charged with glorifying
violence and terrorism, perpetuating anti-Semitic stereotypes and
even lying about their own history.
On the other hand, there was support from the community and e-mails
to the Berkeley Art Center included comments like: “A powerful,
scathing experience. Thank you for it” and “It was
very thought provoking to see the other side.” Even an Israeli
offered ”my admiration for your courage in showing this important
protest art.”
Organizers had hoped to make “Justice Matters” a traveling
show to raise money for a graphics and screen-printing workshop
in the West Bank’s Dheisheh refugee camp. There aren’t
many communities which will dare host it now. While Americans cherish
freedom of speech, some words and images are not welcome. Lubin
concludes her note: “What about our First Amendment rights
to have an art exhibit in Berkeley, California?”
New York Theater’s shocking cancelation of “My Name
is Rachel Corrie” is not the first time a brave voice was
silenced—but let’s make sure it’s the last.
Delinda C. Hanley is news editor of the Washington Report. |