Washington Report, November 2005, pages 29, 67
Special Report
An Arab-American Priest, Depleted Uranium, and Iraq
By Robert Hirschfield
 |
 |
| Father Simon Harak (Photo R. Hirschfield). |
| |
|
TRAVELING around southern Iraq in the late 1990s to investigate
the effects of U.N. economic sanctions on ordinary Iraqis, Jesuit
Father Simon Harak stopped at a hospital in Basra. Meeting with
him and his colleagues from the anti-sanction group Voices in the
Wilderness, Dr. Jenan Hassan briefed them about the medical horrors
she and other doctors were confronting as a result of the use of
depleted uranium (DU) weapons by the U.S. Army in southern Iraq
during the 1991 Gulf war. There was a fivefold increase in cancer,
especially leukemia, she said, and a five- to eightfold increase
in children born with genetic defects.
Dr. Hassan showed the Voices group some of the newborns.
“We saw a baby with a head growing out of his head,” recalled
Harak. “We saw babies with intestines growing outside their
bodies.”
Sitting in his spartan cubicle in Lower Manhattan, where he works
as the anti-militarism coordinator for the War Resisters League,
Harak, a 57-year-old Arab-American whose parents are from Lebanon,
emphasized that, in comparison to the 300 tons of DU weaponry used
against Iraq in the first Gulf war, U.S. forces deployed more than
1,000 tons during the 2003 invasion.
“Given the fact that there is an incubation period involved
here,” he pointed out, “we shall soon be seeing the
second wave of cancer and birth defects as a result of that war.”
From his computer, a crucial weapon of 21st century dissent, the
Jesuit dispatches the results of his DU research to hundreds of
people throughout the country. He maintains close contact with
the Manhattan Project, the only group that devotes itself exclusively
to DU. Their collaboration is still mainly on the level of information
gathering. Harak’s goal is for information to translate into
social action.
“Depleted uranium,” he explained in his methodical,
professorial way (having once taught ethics at Fairfield College), “is
60 percent radioactive. It is also heavy metal toxic. It
is a byproduct of the uranium enrichment process of nuclear weapons
production from which uranium’s most radioactive isotope,
U235, is recovered for re-use in new fuel rods.”
The DU weapons used in Iraq were far more deadly, he explained,
far more enduring—Japanese scientist Katsuma Yagasaki estimates
that DU’s radiation has a half-life of 4.5 billion years—and
far less publicized than car bombs and roadside bombs. The DU was
present in missiles, tank shells, and rocket-propelled grenades.
Formidable at armor piercing, these weapons were known to aerosolize
on impact into tiny particles that could be inhaled or ingested.
Harak used the case of Basra to illustrate how the damage was
done.
“Basra is on a river,” he noted. “A DU shell
poisons the water in a river. It poisons the grasses and the grains.
It sinks into the ground and poisons the water table. When it gets
into the body, it does incredible damage. The combination of radioactivity
and heavy metal toxicity is such that it affects the DNA in such
a way that you get genetic alterations.”
Harak recalled being told by doctors in Basra that the deformed
children they were delivering reminded them of the pictures they
had seen of Chernobyl babies. When a baby is born in Basra, the
doctors said, the first question the mother asks her obstetrician
is: “Is it all right?”
Lacking in the late ‘90s, when he was in Iraq, and needed
now, he said, were scientific studies, longitudinal and cause-and-effect
studies, that would prove conclusively that there was uranium in
the blood of deformed children and cancer victims.
“The tests cost $1,000 each,” Harak bemoaned. “And
when the sanctions were in effect, the equipment doctors would
have had to bring in to run the tests were banned. The sanctions
forbade pencils, for the love of God!”
As an Arab-American, Harak was powerfully moved by the suffering
of Iraqis, and said he would like to go back. But he doesn’t
want his Iraqi friends to run the risk of being seen with an American,
even an Arab-American—in his case, an Arab-American who speaks
no Arabic. Lamented the Christian Arab: “Catholics
always took so seriously the words of Jesus when he said, ‘This
is my body.’ But Jesus also said, ‘Love your enemies.’ That,
unfortunately, was never taken so seriously.”
Harak reflected on the underpublicized issue of the exposure of
U.S. veterans to DU.
“How much of what was called Gulf War Syndrome was due to
exposure to DU?” he asked. “It’s hard to say.
But some of the symptoms are similar to those Iraqis suffered from:
fatigue, blood disorders, heart conditions, the damaging of the
genetic code. You see parallel defects in children of American
veterans and Iraqi children: the little flipper hands growing out
of the children’s shoulders without any arms attached.”
Soldiers worried about exposure to uranium and wanting to be tested
found that their veteran’s medical insurance refused to cover
the cost. Harak recalled one case in which The New York Daily
News agreed to pay to have nine Gulf war veterans tested. Four
of them were found to have uranium in their bloodstream.
Last year, Harak helped organize a small rally in New York’s
Washington Square Park at which speakers and singers alerted people
to the dangers of DU. On the question of why this issue has failed
to make more of an impact, Harak speculated, “Maybe it’s
because a lot of the damage is not immediate. There is an incubation
period involved. You don’t see hands being blown off, or
people being cluster-bombed,” he noted. “It’s
much more insidious.”
Robert Hirschfield is a New York-based free-lance journalist. |