Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, March 2003, pages
6-7
Special Report
False Images and Lies Hide Middle East Realities
By Rachelle Marshall
People come to me and tell me they are frightened, that the
world has forgotten them. I tell them they are right.—Rev. Shawki
Baterian, priest at the Church of Nativity, Bethlehem, December
24, 2002.
The year 2002 ended with the gap between myth and reality in the
Middle East as great as at any time since the Crusaders set out
to seek the Holy Grail and ended up slaughtering Muslims and Jews
in the name of God. As Christians around the world celebrated the
birth of the Prince of Peace, the city where he was born was under
curfew and surrounded by Israeli tanks. In a sad twist to the Nativity
story of a family seeking shelter in a manger, on Christmas eve
the army demolished another 20 homes in Gaza, leaving more than
a hundred Palestinians homeless.
Meanwhile an American president who claims Jesus as his inspiration
prepared to unleash on 22 million Iraqis what a San Francisco
Chronicle report of December 16 described as “a relentless,
overwhelming onslaught.” As the new year began, a hundred thousand
U.S. troops and thousands of aircraft armed with devastating firepower
were poised on Iraq’s borders ready to attack. Although civilians
would be the first to suffer in the event of a new Gulf war, Secretary
of State Colin Powell declared that U.S. policy was aimed at “liberating
the Iraqi people.”
Powell fudged the truth again when the Bush administration rebuffed
a plea by the European Union that the United States join with Russia,
the European Union, and the United Nations in officially adopting
a three-year timetable for the creation of a Palestinian state.
Although the “roadmap to peace” was originally proposed by George
Bush, Powell now claimed it was not yet ready for adoption. The
reason was clear. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon had expressed
opposition to the plan and the White House was once again bowing
to Israel’s wishes.
Sharon objected to requirements in the proposal that Israel halt
settlement construction and agree to a firm schedule leading to
the creation of a Palestinian state. In a speech on December 4 he
said Israel would make no concessions at all until Palestinian President
Yasser Arafat was replaced and “there is proven calm and Palestinian
reforms”—an unlikely possibility as long as Israel’s occupation
continues.
The euphoria aroused on the left when the Labor party nominated
a pro-peace candidate, Amram Mitzna, for prime minister quickly
dissipated when the party chose a slate of Knesset candidates led
by centrists Shimon Peres, Benjamin Ben Eliezer, and Ephraim Sneh,
all of whom served in the recent coalition government. Prominent
peace activists Yossi Beilin and Yael Dayan ended up so far down
on the list that they resigned from Labor and joined the liberal
Meretz party.
Heading the Likud party list, just under Sharon, is former prime
minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who opposes a Palestinian state under
any circumstances. Others on the list are such extreme hawks that
a political analyst for Yediot Ahronot wrote, “Unless Sharon
gets a strong Labor Party with which he can form a coalition…there
is no Palestinian state, no evacuation of settlements, no Bush roadmap.”
After it was revealed that several Likud members had bribed their
way onto the candidates’ list, polls showed that the party could
lose up to five seats because of the scandal, and might have to
join with Labor in a coalition government. But in any case Likud
is expected to remain the majority party, with Sharon as prime minister.
A predominantly rightwing Knesset was further assured when the Likud-dominated
Israeli election commission barred from running again two influential
Arab legislators, Azmi Bishara and Ahmed Tibi, but approved Baruch
Marzel, a former member of the extremist Kach party.
Whether or not a coalition is necessary, as long as Sharon heads
the government and Bush allows Israel to determine U.S. Middle East
policy, no serious peace proposal will be allowed to take shape.
Even Bush’s roadmap to peace is fast becoming irrelevant. While
diplomats quibble over when to adopt a timetable for a future Palestinian
state Israel is moving toward making such a state impossible.
The “Seam Project” the Israelis are building at a cost of nearly
a billion dollars will surround every major Palestinian community
with barriers between 165 and 230 feet wide when it is completed
next June. Barriers will consist of high cement walls, moats studded
with metal obstacles, and electronic gates. A fence around Jerusalem
will extend far enough to encompass parts of Bethlehem, so that
some 300,000 Palestinians will find themselves cut off from their
West Bank neighbors and in a kind of no-man’s-land. Israel is also
seizing more land from Palestinian farmers in order to establish
broad security zones around Israeli settlements. Soldiers stationed
on watchtowers will be allowed to shoot any Palestinians who try
to enter, even if only to tend their crops.
The grim reality of what is happening in Gaza and the West Bank
has so far had no place on the diplomatic agenda. In an effort to
crush Palestinian resistance by brute force, the Israelis launched
a reign of killings and arrests in December that left 63 Palestinians
dead and an additional 1,200 Palestinians in prison. The Israeli
attacks lost none of their intensity as the new year began, with
mothers and children, old people and the handicapped, teachers and
medical workers, among the victims.
Despite Israel’s increasingly lethal attacks, Palestinians
refrained from violence for more than a month.
One of the cruelest of the prevalent myths is that Palestinian
terrorists kill innocent Israelis deliberately, while soldiers kill
Palestinian civilians only “unintentionally,” when under attack
themselves. In fact innocent Palestinians are the victims whenever
the Israelis bomb an apartment house or fire tank shells into a
crowded marketplace. A 95-year old woman died when soldiers at a
checkpoint fired 17 shots into the taxi she was riding in. A 17-year
old student was arrested and beaten to death as he left a mosque.
A teacher was stopped while driving home with a load of groceries
and shot to death. Five unarmed men were killed trying to sneak
into Israel for work. Their bodies were found to be shredded by
flechettes, inch-long steel darts shaped like fishhooks that are
condemned by human rights organizations as especially cruel weapons.
Even U.N. relief agencies, which offer the vital services that
Israel refuses to provide in the occupied territories, have become
targets of attack. According to UNRWA Commissioner Peter Hansen
the Israelis traumatize school children by blowing up buildings
next to U.N. schools or by using the schools as operation posts.
On December 4 Israeli soldiers dynamited a food storage warehouse
run by the U.N.World Food Program that served 41,300 destitute Palestinians
in Gaza. Between late November and late December soldiers killed
at least four U.N. workers.
After a senior U.N. official, Iain Hook, was shot to death, 62
employees sent a letter to Secretary General Kofi Annan complaining
that U.N. staff members were being “verbally abused, stripped, beaten,
shot at and killed by Israeli soldiers.” But their complaint was
fruitless. Twelve members of the Security Council approved a resolution
on December 21 condemning Israel for the killing of U.N. workers
and the destruction of the U.N. food warehouse, only to have the
United States veto it. Cambodia and Bulgaria abstained.
Despite Israel’s increasingly lethal attacks, Palestinians refrained
from violence for more than a month until Israeli undercover assassination
squads swept through Palestinian towns and refugee camps on Dec.
26 in raids that left at least 9 Palestinians dead and scores injured.
The killings took place as Egyptian and Palestinian leaders were
working out a truce agreement with Palestinian militants, and just
after Hamas promised to refrain from attacks within Israel if Israel
stopped assassinating its members. Palestinians immediately accused
Sharon of deliberately scuttling the talks in order to assure continued
violence and thereby weaken the hand of moderate candidates in the
coming election.
If so, Sharon got his wish. Two days later Palestinian gunmen
killed four members of a Yeshiva near Hebron. In the week that followed
Israeli soldiers killed fifteen more Palestinians, including 10-year
old Abdulkarim Salameh and 9-year old Haneen Abu Suleiman. But no
matter how many Palestinian children the Israelis kill, how many
acres of Palestinian land they seize, or how many Palestinian homes
they destroy, the dominant message most Americans receive is that
the cause of the conflict is Palestinian terrorism. This is the
myth perpetuated by Israeli leaders and backed by a Bush administration
that justifies as self-defense every cold-blooded killing by the
Israelis. Such justification, the editor of the Jerusalem Times
wrote recently, “has given the green light to Israel to continue
a policy of gradual yet systematic murder of the Palestinian people.”
Nevertheless, some Israelis have the courage to identify the occupation
as the true cause of the conflict. Historian Amos Elon points out
in the December 19 issue of the New York Review of Books
that the 1947 partition plan forced Palestinians to pay with their
land and their homes for the crimes of Europe. He cites evidence
that immediately after the 1967 war Palestinian leaders proposed
a two-state solution, with a demilitarized Palestinian state in
the West Bank but that Israel rejected the offer and instead proceeded
to make its occupation of Palestine permanent. Elon quotes former
Israeli attorney general Michael Ben Yair’s summary of Israel’s
subsequent actions : “We enthusiastically chose to become a colonialist
society, ignoring international treaties, expropriating lands, transferring
settlers to the occupied territories, engaging in theft, and finding
justification for all this.”
Such statements offer hope that someday the reality of what is
happening in the Middle East will overtake myth, and in doing so
clear the way for justice.
Rachelle Marshall is a free-lance editor living in Stanford,
CA. A member of the International Jewish Peace Union, she writes
frequently on the Middle East. |