June 1993, Page 26
What Should the U.S. Be Doing About Bosnia?Three Congressional
Views
Help a Sovereign Nation to Protect Itself
By Senator Russ Feingold
It is becoming a cliché that one of the most tragic and
troubling conflicts of our time has been how to respond to the unspeakable
horrors perpetrated by Slobodan Milosevic's Serbian armies against
the people of the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina. There are no simple
solutions to this problem, but that is no justification for the
apparent paralysis of the international community regarding Bosnia.
Despite good-faith attempts of some to avert disaster, the former
Yugoslavia is suffering the bloodiest violence on European soil
since the Second World War. President Clinton and Secretary Christopher
have actively engaged the U. S. in efforts in this arena, and rightfully
so. This president deserves much credit for acknowledging the difficulty
we face in Bosnia and for his efforts to help. His involvement has
been more responsive than that of the previous administration.
Unfortunately, it is time to recognize that we must take additional
steps which would offer profound and constructive intervention into
thisthe most seriousof post-Cold War wars. Extraordinary
action must be taken to counter this extraordinarily grave situation.
History will reveal how Europe, Russia, the United Nations, and
the United States should have responded differently over the past
few years. But after months and months of wringing our hands, paralyzed
by inaction because we cannot find the perfect solution, we must
deal with the situation as it stands today. We must accept that
there are no simple or " no-risk" solutions: as Defense
Secretary Les Aspin said in April, "I have never seen a government
problem with no, totally no, good options before."
Sadly enough, this complexity is used by many to conclude that
we should do nothing. Nothing, but watch as Slobodon Milosevic's
army seeks to wipe away an infant nation.
History also teaches us many lessons. One of the most important
is that we simply cannot stand by and do nothing when we are confronted
with unbridled tyranny and genocide. History has taught us that
inaction is not an appropriate response to horror.
This spring we commemorated the 50th Anniversary of the Warsaw
Ghetto Uprising. In 1943, a powerful mechanized Nazi army using
air and ground forces and blitzkrieg tactics battered the Jews who
were surrounded in the Ghetto of Warsaw, Poland. For three weeks,
some 700 mostly young men and women fought the Nazi army to a standstill.
They improvised weapons, explosives and tactics. There was no outside
help. During those 21 heroic, miraculous days, the defenders of
the Ghetto fought off thousands of Nazi soldiers, tanks and airplanes
until their arms and supplies were exhausted and they were overwhelmed.
Our pain in remembering the Uprising was intensified by the knowledge
of "ethnic cleansing" and "forcible transfer"
taking place now, in 1993, in the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina
where an entire people, virtually unarmed and unprotected, are alone
in defending against a rather sophisticated military arsenal.
The people who fought in the Uprising demonstrated that a small
force of inspired but poorly armed defenders could challenge a powerful
military machine, but only for a short while. Those fighting today
to defend their homes in Bosnia-Herzegovina face similar handicaps
and unfortunately similar odds.
This is why I have long advocated a lifting of the United Nations
arms embargo against Bosnia-Herzegovina. This should have been our
first step in helping to halt the atrocities taking place in the
Balkans. A sovereign nation must have the ability to protect itself.
This right is guaranteed by Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.
Fifty years ago, six million Jews and millions of other members
of ethnic groups were systematically annihilated by Adolf Hitler,
the Nazis and their accomplices in Europe. Earlier this year we
dedicated the U., S. Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC. That dedication
was premised on the commitment that "never again" would
the world have to endure the horror of genocide. The museum was
built to "bear witness" to that horror so that we can
better understand how to stop it from happening again.
While the industrialized menace of the gigantic Nazi death machine
has not been recreated in Bosnia-Herzegovina, there are all too
many disturbing similarities. The world has a chance to learn from
what happened in 1943, right now, today, in 1993.
If the phrase "never again" is to mean anything, we cannot
allow the Bosnian people to stand defenseless in the face of further
Serbian massacres. If we fail in this, the memory of the Uprising
and the moving symbolism of the Holocaust Museum will be little
more than empty monuments to hypocrisy.
Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) is a member of the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee. |