Washington Report, October 7, 1985, Page 2
Editorial
Winning All the Battles But Losing the War?
September brought new triumphs for the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC), Israel's awesome lobby in the U.S. Its Congressional
disciples had warned the Reagan administration not to introduce
into Congress the long-postponed plan to sell 40 F-15s to Saudi
Arabia. Even with Congressional armament restrictions limiting their
role to defense of Saudi territory, and basing restrictions literally
keeping them out of range of Israeli territory, the Congressmen
said they would oppose the sale so vociferously that it would doom
the rest of the two planned weapons sales packages for Saudi Arabia
and Jordan.
So the administration's decision to give up on the sale was passed
to the Saudis, who bought British attack jets instead. They come
with no restrictions on the weaponry they carry, or on basing. America's
aircraft industry therefore lost $3 billion up front and an incalculable
amount in follow-up training, servicing and spare parts contracts.
The Israelis will lose the ability to overfly Saudi Arabian territory
near Tabuk air base with impunity. They will, therefore, doubtless
be demanding more free U.S. weapons to compensate for the resulting
damage to their "security."
In the words of Middle East Arms Expert Anthony Cordesman, "the
implications for the U.S. are disastrous." But that's not all.
"AIPAC," he adds, "has done more damage to Israel
in the last three months in terms of the political and military
consequences than is imaginable."
Thanks a heap, AIPAC.
If anyone believes that America's mainstream, national press is
more independent of the lobby than are our Congressmen, however,
let him consider the selective media coverage of the Reverend Benjamin
Weir, the second of the "forgotten" American hostages
to emerge from long-term captivity by Shiite extremists in Lebanon.
With Americans naturally curious to listen to a Christian minister
who was rewarded for 31 years of selfless service in Lebanon by
being held blind-folded and in solitary confinement for more than
a year, and with the lives of six remaining hostages possibly riding
on his ability to deliver a message from his captors, he could hardly
be denied national television exposure. He got it in a televised
press conference in Washington held by the Presbyterian Church.
After the message from his captors calling for release of 17 Iraqis
and Lebanese convicted of terrorist bombings in Kuwait was delivered,
virtually every reporter in the audience, including former hostage
Jeremy Levin of Cable News Network, tried by sympathetic questioning
to help the Reverend Weir say what was obviously on his own mind:
That Americans should reexamine a Middle East policy that is putting
us all in jeopardy while hurting, not helping, reasonable Arabs
and Israelis alike.
He said it, and eloquently, but not a hint of these most important
questions and answers of the entire press conference appeared in
the news accounts or the "partial transcripts" compiled
by the Washington Post and the New York Times. Readers
in the nation's capital who didn't hear the statements live on television
would never have known they were made at all except for an account
printed in the Washington Times.
Congratulations again, AIPAC. You've turned the publishers and
editors of our two "great national newspapers" into craven
flacks for Israel. Too bad you overlooked the little Washington
Times. Don't punish them too severely by scaring away all
of their advertising, though. They're new and maybe they just
didn't know any better.
Clearly, by now virtually all working journalists know better.
They know what's been happening in the Middle East, and they know
why they dare not write or talk about it in Washington. It used
to be possible to count prominent U.S. media personalities who knew
enough about the Middle East to express private doubts about Israel
on the fingers of two hands. Now most journalists clearly
entertain those private doubts. In fact, one can almost count
on the fingers of one hand the nationally-syndicated media
figures who remain Israel-right-or-wrong true believers like George
Will, Joseph Kraft, and William Safire. Most of the others maintain
a kind of fearful, sullen silence. As was so clearly demonstrated
at the Weir press conference, however, they know.
The change is due to no lack of zealousness by the lobby. It's
quite simply because, under the leadership of men like Yitzhak Shamir,
Ariel Sharon, and Meir Kahane, Israel is deteriorating into an economic
and moral quagmire from which an entire class of educated and skilled
Jewish citizens is quietly fleeing. Israel's American apologists
have to work harder and harder in the media and Congress to keep
the lid on. As each new lobby triumph damages still more Americans,
however, awareness spreads.
"Good Americans" of the Benjamin Weir and Jeremy Levin
mold are reluctant to believe the worst about anyone, until guilt
is absolutely proven. But when it is, they are equally reluctant
to just stand by and do nothing. We think we saw evidence of that
at a just-concluded convention of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination
Committee (ADC). Among the speakers who joined the Arab-American
members were a former chief of naval operations and many ordinary
seamen who served under him. They reminded participants of an early
lobby triumph, the thwarting of an official investigation into why
Israel attacked the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967, killing 34 and wounding
171 Americans. There were also former members of Congress, former
ambassadors, and other high officials of the Executive Branch, all
of them victims of past lobby triumphs.
All were there to speak out and they did. Although lobby victims
aren't new, lobby victims who fight back are. We think it's clear
evidence that "the times they are a changing." Read our
excerpts from former Senator Charles Percy's remarks at the Middle
East Institute's Annual Conference, and Robert Hazo's report on
the ADC convention in this issue and let us know if you agree.
Richard Curtiss was Chief Inspector of the US Information Agency
when he retired in 1980 after 31 years of service with the U.S.
Army, Department of State, and USIA. |