December/January 1992/93, Page 67
Christianity and the Middle East
Israel's High Court Plays Grinch for Messianic
Jewish Couple
By the Reverend L. Humphrey Walz
Seasonally for 35 years, the sales of Dr. Seuss's classic, How
the Grinch Stole Christmas, have soared in children's book departments.
For the last 35 months, however, a comparable adult-level tale,
so far without a happy ending, has remained almost unknown outside
of Israel. It is the story of how that country's High Court grinched
Dec. 25, 1989 for Shirley and Gary Beresford and dimmed the cheer
of subsequent Christmases for countless of their co-religionists.
The Beresfords are South African Jews who, three years after their
1982 wedding, began studying the life and teachings of Jesus and
His relationship with their ancestral faith. Out of this grew their
belief in Him as the Wonderful Counselor and Prince of Peace foretold
by Isaiah as God's "Anointed" (Hebrew "Messiah,"
Greek "Christos") who would express—and evoke—the spirit
of justice, compassion and integrity that could, if fully responded
to, bring reconciliation among all people, including "natural"
enemies.
They saw such convictions as amplifying, not departing from, their
ancestral religion. Hence, they concluded that Israel's "Law
of Return" was applicable to them and to their prospects for
life among fellow Jews amidst the scenes of Christ's ministry. "Every
Jew," that 1950 law proclaims, "has a right to come to
this country as an oleh"—an immigrant with automatic
"national" (first-class) citizen status.
When, however, they applied for oleh visas, the Israeli
consulate declared them ineligible. A Jewish Agency emissary, it
seems, had "discovered" that, although they had neither
been baptized nor joined a church, they were "Christians theologically"
who associated with other "Messianic Jews" and attended
Jews for Jesus meetings. This was deemed enough to reject them under
the clause in Israel's 1952 Nationality Law that "the rights
of a Jew under any other law [do not hold for] a Jew who willingly
professes another faith."
Shirley and Gary decided to travel to Jerusalem on visitors' visas
and hire Israeli attorney Yosef Ben Menashe to present to the High
Court their case that, ever since the dawn of Christianity, there
had been "Messianic Jews" who, while following Jesus,
retained their Jewish identity. Through the centuries, such were
considered part of a "recognized strain in Judaism [that] was
[and still is] legitimate." They declared that their Jewish
identity additionally was clear in that they observed the Saturday
Sabbath and the Jewish holidays, followed kosher dietary laws, wanted
to become Israeli citizens and were ready to serve in its armed
forces.
They cited the case of David Dorflinger, a Jewish youth who had
been saved from the Nazis at heavy personal risk by a Catholic family
whose faith he at first admired and then wholeheartedly embraced.
He joined a monastic order and wanted to serve in Israel as a fellow-citizen
with Jews there. He applied to immigrate and his application initially
was accepted on the halachic basis that both his parents
were Jews, he was born Jewish and "once a Jew, always a Jew."
Israeli authorities subsequently concluded, however, that a Catholic
priest, as the Israelis considered Dorflinger, could not be accepted
as Jewish and, the Beresfords were reminded, the Law of Return had
been amended in 1970 to prevent any more such applications.
The two justices assigned to the case filled 90 pages, telling
how, though following contrasting legal concepts, both had reached
the same conclusion. Justice Menachem Elon went the "religion"
route that a willing convert to another faith forfeited the legal
and social rights of a "member of the Jewish people."
Justice Aharon Barak took the "secular" approach that
the "majority consensus of the Jewish population today"
(unlike Jews of earlier times) would not accept the Beresfords
as fellow Jews. They chose Christmas as the day to announce their
decision.
It took the Messianic Jewish Alliance of America (P.O. Box 417,
Wynnewood, PA 19096) and the International Alliance of Messianic
Congregations and Synagogues four months to winnow the data and
raise the funds for a full-page reply in the international edition
of the Jerusalem Post of May 5, 1990. Claiming to speak for
over 100,000 Messianic Jews in 15 countries including Israel, their
ad challenged Judge Elon's statement that in "the last 2,000
years of history . . . the Jewish people has decided that Messianic
Jews do not belong to the Jewish nation . . . and have no right
to force themselves on it."
"When was such a decision made, and by whom?" the ad
asks rhetorically. It reminds Judge Barak that a 1988 Dahaf poll
found 78 percent of Israelis favored granting oleh status
to Messianics on the same basis as to other Jews. It then proceeds
to crowd 21 paragraphs with pertinent Biblical and post-Biblical
history and doctrine in support of the Beresfords' case. Among its
points are: Most Jews in Israel have abandoned their historic faith
and become hiloni (unaffiliated, largely agnostic and atheist),
yet continue to hold "Jewish nationality" status. Also
an untold proportion of those whom the Nazis doomed as "Jews"
were of mixed ethnic origins (some with as little as 1/8 Jewish
blood) and were of widely varying religious affiliations; yet they
are statistically included among the "Jewish martyrs of the
Holocaust."
The ad is headed "An Open Letter to the Supreme Court of Israel."
The word "Supreme" is misleading for American readers,
as the High Court can be overruled by elements in the Israeli administration
or legislature. Israel has neither an American style constitution
nor a bill of rights upon which that court can base its decisions.
Nonetheless, it was to be Shirley and Gary Bereford's court of last
appeal to get out from under the shadow of the Grinch then or on
any later Christmas. Perhaps the experience will make them and their
friends more vividly aware of the helplessness felt by Christian
and Muslim Palestinians in the face of continuous withholding of
their territorial and civil rights by Israeli courts.
One organization that sought in vain to help the Beresfords is
headquartered in California (Jews for Jesus, 60 Haight St., San
Francisco, CA 94102). Its tracts and newsletters are free. Its lively
traveling "Liberated Wailing Wall" troupe performs in
churches in return for a free-will offering. These vocalists and
instrumentalists intersperse their short, dramatic Biblical sketches
and inspirational monologues with a musical blend of Jewish minor-key
melodies and a strong "Gospel" beat. The troupers derive
their title from the Western wall in Jerusalem where Jews have long
worshipped, coupled with a reminder of the Messiah as Liberator.
They call their performance "An Experience of
Messianic Joy," which is also what Christmas generally is supposed
to be, and so far have been Grinch proof.
Church of Cyprus Seeks End to 18-Year Occupation
One of Christendom's oldest communities, organized in Apostolic
times (See Acts 4, 11, 13, 15, 21, 27), the Church of Cyprus has,
throughout the centuries, offered an island haven for Christians
throughout the Middle East. Even now, until Beirut settles back
into its traditional interfaith normalcy, it provides emergency
headquarters for the Middle East Council of Churches (MECC).
Historically it also has had to contend with its own problems of
alien conquest and occupation. Those, too, have their modern counterpart:
1992 marks the 19th year of Turkish military domination of the northern
38 percent of the country.
Geography grants the Church of Cyprus membership in the Conference
of European Churches (CEC) as well as in the MECC. It was to an
11-day assembly of the former in Prague in September (with a follow-up
Synod memorandum to the secretary-general of the U.N.) that Archbishop
Chrysostomos presented the following charges against the Turkish
military occupiers:
They have uprooted 30 percent of the population (82 percent of
the uprooted are Christian), confiscated their properties, introduced
Turkish immigrant-settlers to take their places, destroyed monasteries,
desecrated such centers of pilgrimage as the tomb of the Apostle
Barnabas, converted churches into mosques, harassed the civilian
public and violated human rights on a wide scale.
He implored the CEC members to mobilize public opinion and rouse
local and national church and secular social-concerns groups to
press their governments to get Turkey to allow the refugees to return
to their homes with all civil rights fully restored.
Balkan Religious Leaders Plead for Multilateral Peacemaking
Efforts
Croats, Muslims and Serbs in fragmented Yugoslavia not only should,
but can reduce—even eliminate—the tragic bloodletting that
continues so relentlessly among them. That, at least, is the conviction
of Serbian Orthodox Patriarch Pavle of Belgrade, Croatian Roman
Catholic Cardinal Franjo Kuhari and Rais ul Ulama Jakub Salimoski,
leader of the Balkan Muslim community. Given solid encouragement
and cooperation, they believe their peoples are capable of overcoming
what Pavle calls "the antagonisms of history—most immediately
those of the Nazi era and the ensuing Communist period— and acting
in unity."
The clerics do not minimize the obstacles to be overcome—nor the
innovations requisite—on many levels: Militarily, they're appealing
for a permanent, comprehensive, unconditional cease-fire and an
end to the practice of "ethnic cleansing." Politically,
they believe, more representative elections must be developed and
more appropriate forms of government— notably the Swiss cantonal
system—need to be explored. Economically, they acknowledge that
outside help "will be essential to the survival of many children,
refugees and others through the coming winter." Psychologically
and spiritually, the warring parties and their supporters must stop
trying to place blame and start recognizing, in Pavle's words, that
"all are equally victims; war benefits only our common enemy,
the devil."
Unable to meet safely in each other's countries, Pavle and Kuhari
arranged to bring their consultative delegations to Switzerland
for deliberations, at the Bossey Ecumenical Center, on basic principles
and practical next steps. Salimoski wanted to join them with a supportive
Muslim delegation, but could not negotiate travel out of Sarajevo.
A CEC/World Council of Churches team, however, has been able to
visit parishes in Croatia, Serbia and Slovenia, hold intimate conversations
and make firsthand observations. It reports grassroots appreciation
for the humanitarian services of the International Red Cross, especially
in prison camps, along with a deep yearning for the day when such
will not be necessary and when neighborly relations and cooperation
will be normal. It also deplores the widespread violation of human
rights and urges the cessation of any form of blessing of weapons.
Meanwhile WCC and CEC General Secretaries Castro and Fischer are
urgently appealing to member churches to press their governments
each to receive a share of the 10,000 political "detainees''
now languishing precariously in Bosnian prison camps. The International
Red Cross, racing against death and desolation, is negotiating for
their release, but this will be meaningless without guaranteed places
for them to take refuge.
Many countries have promised to be supportive should such emergencies
arise. When it has come down to specific cases, however, only a
few countries have been willing to receive any of the first 5,000
whose release was sought by the U.N. High Commission for Refugees.
A common excuse for refusal of sanctuary is that the refugees should
be settled nearer home. Yet the adjacent countries of Croatia and
Serbia already are swamped with the 700,000 and 500,000 refugees,
respectively, they are trying to accommodate. Castro and Fischer
are, in this predicament, backing other U.N. agencies and the Red
Cross in a desperate hope that grassroots individuals and groups
may become concerned enough to urge their governments to offer some
fraction of the needed hospitality.
Multifaith Calendar
For the seventh consecutive year the Canadian Ecumenical Action
has produced a 32-page 10 1/2 x 13 1/2-inch Multifaith Calendar
marking and interpreting the holy days and religious festivals
of Islam, Judaism, Eastern and Western Christianity and eight other
world faiths whose emblems form a rainbow on its cover. Interspersed
with 12 full-page color reproductions of art depicting interfaith
understanding and cooperation, it may now be ordered in the U.S.
at $9.50 from Multifaith Resources, P.O. Box 128, Wofford Heights,
CA 93285. Headed by Rev. Dr. Charles R. White, the organization
provides materials and guidance for intercultural and interfaith
participation and collaboration with special concern for pluralistic
community-building and human rights.
Interreligious Committee for Mideast Peace
The U.S. Interreligious Committee for Middle East Peace, with Rev.
Ronald Young still at its helm, has a new office at 1920 Holme Ave.,
Philadelphia, PA 19136. Added to its busy 1992 schedule were its
State Department-initiated conferences of American Jewish, Christian
and Muslim leaders with Arab and Israeli delegations to the Middle
East peace talks. Its 1993 plans for mobilizing public support for
peacemaking opportunities will include national and regional convocations
on "The Role of Religious Values in the Search for Peace,"
and a trip by prominent Americans to meet with religious leaders
in Egypt, Israel, Israeli-occupied territories, Jordan and Syria.
The Rev. L. Humphrey Walz, D.D., retired associate executive
of the Presbyterian Synod of the Northeast, is active in denominational
and ecumenical peacemaking activities. |